|
KMID : 1147020200230020019
|
|
Korean Journal of Psychodrama
2020 Volume.23 No. 2 p.19 ~ p.35
|
|
|
The Possibility of Monistic Integration in Psychodrama: Focused on Comparison of Eastern and Western Philosophies
|
|
Choi Mu-Young
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of unifying confrontational issues, such as ‘reality and fantasy’, ‘thoughts and emotions’, and ‘language and action’, expressed in psychodrama, unilaterally from four discourses of Eastern and Western philosophy. For this purpose, the possibility of unilateral reasons for seeking harmony and balance between the two confrontations was found in the four philosophical discourses of the East and the West: Wonhyo's “Il-Shim,” “Chaosmos by G. Deleuze”, “Hon-Won-Ji-Il-Ki by Dong-Hak” and N. Bohr's “complementarity principle”. In psychodrama, ‘individuals and groups’, ‘mental and material’ and ‘body and mind’ are complementary relationships that need each other, not dualistic. The real world (or objective reality) of the individual and the fantastic domain (subjective domain) do not conflict with each other, and these two worlds can be freely represented in the realm of psychodrama, allowing for mutual harmony and appropriate balance. The issue of action is so important that psychodrama is called the science of conduct. The psychodrama view of action should be expanded to a wider extent simply in terms of body movement and location movement. Until now, the existence-oriented perspectives of Western philosophy have been confrontational with issues such as ‘reality and fantasy’, ‘subjection and object’, ‘individual and group’, ‘act and language’, ‘existence and creation’, ‘reason and emotion’. However, we need an eye to look at this confrontation in monism and integrated way from the perspective of generation and change.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Psychodrama, oriental Philosophy, action, monism emotion
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|